Case file · The Beverly Jarosz Case
Updated October 8, 2026Status: open, unsolved
STATUSGarfield Heights police use new DNA techniques and have named an unnamed person of significant interest. No one has been charged. We could not date the person-of-interest report.

The Beverly Jarosz case: a teenager strangled at home in broad daylight, and a friend police have named only as a person of interest.

On Dec 28, 1964, Beverly Jarosz, 16, was strangled and stabbed in her bedroom in Garfield Heights, Ohio. Her father found her after returning home that afternoon. Garfield Heights police say the case is a top priority, and newly found DNA and an unnamed person of significant interest have not led to a charge.

Cold Case Checker's conclusion · Oct 2026

Case file at a glance

Police recovered the rope used and have since applied advanced M-Vac DNA testing to key items, which they say produced newly discovered DNA. Her family believes she knew her killer. The Ohio Attorney General says several possible suspects were developed. No one has been charged in more than 60 years.

VictimBeverly Jarosz, 16
DateDec 28, 1964
PlaceHer home, Garfield Heights
CauseStrangled, stabbed
ConvictedNo one
Lead agencyGarfield Heights Police
  1. At home, in daylight.Det. Mark Menary said the killing happened around 1:30 p.m. Her father found her between 4 and 4:30 p.m.
  2. Strangled and stabbed.The Attorney General says she was strangled and stabbed. Police recovered the rope.
  3. New DNA.M-Vac testing on key items found DNA that was not known before, police say.
  4. A person of interest.Police have called a man a person of significant interest. His name is withheld and he has not been charged.

Editorial assessment of public sources, not a finding of fact. Nobody named here has been charged unless this page says so.

What happened

Details come from NBC News (Dec 29, 2024), News 5 Cleveland, and the Ohio Attorney General (case 2032).

The attack

Beverly Jarosz is attacked in her bedroom at her family home. A friend who came by could not get in, noticed doors open or closed that were normally the opposite, and heard loud music from upstairs.

Found

A second friend phones her grandmother. Her father arrives home and finds her.

Suspects developed

The Ohio Attorney General says the investigation produced several possible suspects. A friend who was interviewed after her death could not be charged on the evidence then.

Sixty years

Police hold a memorial and say advanced M-Vac DNA testing on key items found new DNA. Menary says the case is a top priority.

Person of interest

Police announce a man as a person of significant interest. They say his alibi has inconsistencies and the people he said he was with have refused to cooperate further.

Victims

A 16-year-old described by family as well liked.

Beverly Jarosz

Photo: Ohio Attorney General listing. The source states no reuse license; shown at the site owner's direction. Contact us to have it removed.

Died

Beverly Jarosz, 16

Beverly Anne Jarosz of Garfield Heights. Her sister has been kept updated by police.

We found no freely licensed photo, so a silhouette is shown. Family members or others who want a photo added, changed, or removed can use the contact form at the bottom of this page.

Evidence

What exists, and what each piece may or may not mean.

ItemWhat is knownDisputed or unknown
The ropeRecovered at the scene.Whether it has been DNA tested in full: partly, per police.
M-Vac DNANewly discovered DNA on key items, per police.Whose DNA, and whether it matches anyone: not public.
The sceneDoors in unusual positions and loud music, per a friend.Photographs and notes: not public.
The weaponA knife was reportedly used.Not recovered per public sources.

Public documents

NBC News and the state listing are the public record.

DocumentHolderWhat it showsAccess
Ohio Attorney General: Beverly JaroszOhio Attorney GeneralCase 2032.Online, free
NBC News DatelineNBC NewsPolice interview, Dec 2024.Online, free
Garfield Heights police fileGarfield Heights PoliceThe 1964 investigation.Withheld or sealed

Access labels: Online, free = we could open it. Fan-hosted copy = a private researcher posted scans; originals are held by the named agency, and we cannot vouch for completeness. Quoted in news = reporters read it; we did not see the document itself. Request needed = held by an agency or court. Withheld = the holder has not released it. We cannot reach non-public records, and we do not try to.

Online discussion (unverified)

Where people talk about this case online, and how to read it.

Not evidence. Public posts are unverified, are often wrong, and sometimes accuse real people. We link the searches so you can see what people are saying, but we do not copy posts, usernames, or accusations onto this page, and we do not treat anything posted online as a source for a claim. If you find something that looks like a genuine lead, send it through the clue form near the top of this page, with a source.
PlatformLive searchWhat you tend to find
Google: Redditsite:reddit.com searchPublic Reddit threads that Google has indexed, including old discussions.
Google: X and TwitterX and Twitter postsPublic posts and profiles that appear in search results.
Google: FacebookPublic Facebook pages and postsOnly public pages and groups that Google can see. Private groups never appear.
Google: Instagram and TikTokInstagram and TikTokPublic posts, memorials, and videos.
Google: forumsForums and message boardsLong-running true-crime forums.
Google NewsLatest newsNewest reporting, which is usually more reliable than posts.
RedditSearch RedditLong discussion threads and theories, often by amateur researchers. No sign-in needed to read.
X (Twitter)Search XShort posts, news links, and anniversary notes. May require sign-in.
FacebookSearch FacebookPublic groups and family or community pages. Requires sign-in.
InstagramSearch #beverlyjaroszMemorial and true-crime posts. Requires sign-in.
YouTubeSearch YouTubeDocumentaries, news clips, and interviews. Quality varies widely.

Be careful with online theories. Naming a private person as a suspect can harm an innocent family, and many "identifications" on forums have been wrong. Our own tools could not read these platforms: Reddit blocks automated access, and the others require an account. The Google searches above work from your browser. To get new public mentions by email, make a free Google Alert for the case name in quotation marks.

Coverage timeline and verification

What local and national reports say, and when we last checked for a solution.

Last verified Oct 8, 2026. No arrest or charge found. The person-of-interest report is undated. We search for arrest, charge, conviction, identification, and genealogy language. This page lists the reports we found and read, oldest first. It is not complete. Print newspaper archives from the years of the crime (for example the Cincinnati Enquirer and Kentucky Post) are not searchable by our tools, so early coverage is mostly missing. A person should check those archives before a case is treated as final.
DateOutletWhat it reportedLink
Dec 29, 2024
NBC News Dateline
New M-Vac DNA; police call it a top priority.
Read
About 2025 (undated)
News 5 Cleveland
Police name an unnamed person of significant interest.
Read
Current
Ohio Attorney General
Case 2032 listing.
Read

Status is re-checked on a regular schedule. If you know of a development we missed, use the clue form near the top of this page or the contact form, and include a link.

Suspects

Police have a person of significant interest. He is not named and not charged.

No one has been charged. Police have withheld the name of the person they call of significant interest. We do not name private individuals who have not been charged.
Unnamed · person of significant interest

A friend who spent time in her home

Why named: Police say he was interviewed after her death, his alibi has inconsistencies, and people he named have refused further cooperation. They say he often carried a knife and rope as hobbies.

Against: No charge has been filed. His name is withheld. A person of interest is not an accused person.

Unnamed

Other possible suspects

Why named: The Attorney General says several possible suspects were developed.

Against: No names are public.

Where a card shows a silhouette, we found no photo. Anyone who wants a photo added, changed, or removed can use the contact form at the bottom of this page.

Latest lead: new DNA and the person of interest

The newest public development is police naming a person of significant interest.

Not an accusation. No one is named here and no one is charged.

What is known

What would settle it

  1. Compare the new DNA with the person of interest, if lawful samples can be obtained.
  2. Genetic genealogy if the DNA is not a match to known suspects.
  3. Re-interview the people tied to his alibi.
Cold Case Checker's assessment

A killing by someone she knew, in her own home

We put the chance that she knew her killer at roughly 85%, because it happened in her home and police report no forced entry. We put the chance of a charge within five years at roughly 25%, because police have new DNA and an active person of interest.

Editorial judgment, not statistics.

Elimination matrix

"—" means no public information, not a clean result.

Person or ideaKnew herPhysical linkLegal outcome
Person of interest (unnamed)✓ friend, per police? DNA work ongoing— not charged
A stranger✗ family believes she knew him——

✗ excluded or contradicted · ✓ supports · ? disputed · — nothing public. No cell is an official finding.

Our hypothesis

Editorial reading of public records. A working theory, not a finding, and it names no individual.

Working theory · confidence stated per point

A personal attack by someone she let in

  1. It was daytime. Loud music was playing.
  2. The home was entered easily. Doors were in unusual positions.
  3. She had been stalked, her family says. A man was obsessed with her.
  4. The DNA may decide it. New testing found new DNA.
Knew her killer Person of interest involved Charge within five years

Judgment, not statistics.

Missing links

Questions raised by gaps in the public record.

1. The DNA profile

Whether it is male and whether it matches anyone.

2. The alibi

What the people named in it say.

3. The friends

Who visited that day and in what order.

4. The weapon

The knife and where it went.

5. The 1964 file

Interviews and photographs.

6. The date of the report

When police announced the person of interest.

Evidence gaps

"Not public" means we could not find a report.

ItemTestedGap
M-Vac resultsTested around 2024.Full results: not public.
RopeCollected.Retention and testing: partly public.
Police fileHeld by Garfield Heights Police.Public index: not available.

Forensic tech

ToolWhat it could doStatus here
DNA from retained evidenceIdentify a donor or exclude people.Unknown; not reported
Forensic genetic genealogyIdentify an unknown donor from relatives.Needs usable DNA; none reported
Ballistics database (NIBIN)Link recovered casings or bullets to other crimes.Not reported

Solved cases

Local cases that moved after decades.

Carol Sue Klaber (Boone County, KY, 1976)

Investigators say a private genealogy investigation helped them identify Thomas Dunaway, who died in 1990, as the man who killed the 16-year-old. He cannot be indicted, so prosecutors sent a letter saying he would have been charged. The lesson: genealogy can name a killer after decades, even when no trial is possible.

Forensic genetic genealogy training

In 2024, local investigators were being trained in the technique, which has already helped solve Cincinnati-area cases, according to FOX19. The lesson: the tool is now local, so cases with usable DNA have a real path forward.

Golden State Killer

Old crime-scene DNA matched relatives in a public database and led to a 2018 arrest. The lesson: a usable sample can still work after decades.

Case details come from public news coverage and the Boone County Sheriff's cold-case list. Confirm in court records.

False leads

ClaimSource and dateWhere it stands
A named suspect did itPodcasts and forumsPolice have not named anyone. Treat as unproven.
Details of the sceneVariousAccounts differ on timing and who found her.

Where

She was killed in her family home in Garfield Heights, a suburb southeast of Cleveland. We do not publish the address.

Open in maps: Garfield Heights, Ohio. We show no photograph of the scene.

Source ratings

SourceTypeRatingUse with care because
NBC News Dateline, Dec 29, 2024National newsA-Police interview.
News 5 ClevelandLocal newsB+Reports the person of interest; the page showed no date.
Ohio Attorney General listingAgencyACase 2032; opened.

Records

Garfield Heights Police Department

Lead agency. Det. Mark Menary: 216-475-5686 (as published); please confirm before calling.

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

Charging decisions.

Ohio Attorney General (BCI)

Case 2032.

Sample public-records request

Under the Ohio Public Records Act, I request copies of non-exempt records relating to the December 28, 1964 homicide of Beverly Jarosz in Garfield Heights, including incident reports, laboratory reports, and any evidence inventory. Please send electronic copies. If any part is withheld, please identify the exemption relied on and release all reasonably segregable material.

Agencies often withhold records of open investigations, so expect partial answers.

Remembering the victims

Beverly was 16. Her sister Carol has kept the case in public view.

If you know something, even something that seems small, contact the investigating agency named above or tips.fbi.gov. We do not list memorial pages until we can confirm families support them.

News & databases

In the news

Loading headlines…

Official

Research

News archives

Sources

Every fact on this page comes from one of these. Where they disagree, we say so above.

The person-of-interest report had no date in the copy we read. The knife and the alibi details come from that report. Her family's belief about a stalker comes from News 5 and is not a police finding. We name no one. We found no charge.

Change log