Case file · The Amy Diesman Case
Updated October 8, 2026Status: open, unsolved
STATUSPierce Township police say the killer likely knew Amy Diesman. A primary suspect was indicted twice and both cases were dismissed. The most recent public update we found is May 2023.

The Amy Diesman case: eight minutes, three people in a store, and a killer who may have known her.

Before dawn on Sept 12, 1987, Amy Diesman, 19, a new mother working her first weeks as a third-shift clerk, was shot twice in the head at a Stop N Go on Ohio 125 in Pierce Township, east of Cincinnati. Police believe three people were in the store minutes earlier. No one has been convicted.

Cold Case Checker's conclusion · Oct 2026

Case file at a glance

The Diesman case has an unusually tight timeline: at 5:27 a.m. three people were inside, and by 5:35 one was dead and one customer was gone. Police believe the killer knew her. Two grand jury indictments of a primary suspect were dismissed, and the case remains open.

VictimAmy Diesman, 19
DateSept 12, 1987
PlacePierce Township, Ohio
Weapon.25 caliber, not found
ConvictedNo one
Lead agencyPierce Township Police
  1. An eight-minute window.Police believe a female customer, a male customer, and Diesman were inside at 5:27 a.m. The woman left, and by 5:35 the man was gone and Diesman was dead.
  2. Two shots, no robbery.She was shot twice in the head with a .25 caliber weapon. There was no sign of sexual assault and no indication of robbery.
  3. A primary suspect, twice indicted.Police say they have a primary suspect, unnamed and described as very close to Diesman. A grand jury indicted the person twice and both cases were dismissed for reasons the report calls unclear.
  4. The killer likely knew her.Police and a Stop N Go internal review reached the same conclusion.

Editorial assessment of public sources, not a finding of fact. Nobody named here has been charged unless this page says so.

What happened

Details come from a May 2023 FOX19 report and the Ohio Attorney General's cold-case listing. The police timeline is from the lead investigator.

A new job

Amy Diesman, 19, a recent New Richmond High School graduate who planned to study nursing, has a four-month-old daughter. She has worked about a week as the third-shift clerk at a Stop N Go on Ohio 125 in Pierce Township.

Three people in the store

Police believe three people were inside: Diesman, a female customer, and a male customer. The woman leaves; the man remains.

The discovery

The male customer is gone and Diesman is dead. A customer entering the store finds her. She was shot twice in the head, once behind the ear and once behind the head, with a .25 caliber weapon. There is no sign of sexual assault and no indication of robbery.

The evidence

Investigators photograph the scene and recover a .25 caliber bullet lodged in a package of donuts and a WEBN sweatshirt. A suspect sketch is made; police now say it is no longer useful. Gun sale records are checked and items are sent to a ballistics lab with no reported results.

Indictments

A primary suspect, unnamed, is indicted twice by a grand jury. Both sets of charges are dismissed.

A new lead investigator

Lt. Bryan Burke begins working the case. The Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation later assists through a cold-case grant.

Evidence shared

Pierce Township police share evidence publicly, hoping to generate tips. No DNA is found on the sweatshirt.

Victims

A young mother in her first weeks at a new job.

Amy Diesman

Photo: Ohio Attorney General, unsolved-homicide listing. The source states no reuse license; shown at the site owner's direction. Contact us to have it removed.

Died

Amy Diesman, 19

A recent New Richmond High School graduate who planned to study nursing. She had a four-month-old daughter and had worked at the store for about a week. Reports say her parents died before the case was solved.

The photo of Amy Diesman is from the Ohio Attorney General's listing and is credited under it. Where a card shows a silhouette, we found no photo. Anyone who wants a photo added, changed, or removed can use the contact form at the bottom of this page.

Evidence

What exists, and what each piece may or may not mean.

ItemWhat is knownDisputed or unknown
The shootingTwo shots to the head with a .25 caliber weapon.The weapon was not found; it is presumed to be a .25 pistol.
The bulletA .25 caliber bullet was found lodged in a package of donuts.None.
The sweatshirtA WEBN sweatshirt was collected. No DNA was found on it.Police say they "thought it possibly was" connected; its relevance is unknown.
The sketchA suspect sketch was made in 1987.Police say it is no longer considered useful.
The timelineAt 5:27 a.m. three people were in the store; at 5:35 one was dead.The male customer is, in police words, a good suspect because he was last with her, but he may not be the killer.
Ballistics and gun recordsGun sale records were checked and items were sent to a ballistics lab.No results are reported.

Public documents

One 2023 local report and the Attorney General's listing are the public record. The dismissed indictments would be in court files.

DocumentHolderWhat it showsAccess
FOX19: Detectives share evidence (2023)FOX19 / WXIXThe timeline, evidence, and what police say about the suspect.Online, free
Amy Diesman, Unsolved HomicideOhio Attorney GeneralThe state's case listing. We saw it in search results but did not open it.Online, free
Two grand jury indictments and their dismissalsClermont County Common Pleas CourtThe charges against the primary suspect and why each was dismissed.Request needed
Pierce Township Police case filePierce Township Police DepartmentThe full investigation, including ballistics.Withheld or sealed

Access labels: Online, free = we could open it. Fan-hosted copy = a private researcher posted scans; originals are held by the named agency, and we cannot vouch for completeness. Quoted in news = reporters read it; we did not see the document itself. Request needed = held by an agency or court. Withheld = the holder has not released it. We cannot reach non-public records, and we do not try to.

Online discussion (unverified)

Where people talk about this case online, and how to read it.

Not evidence. Public posts are unverified, are often wrong, and sometimes accuse real people. We link the searches so you can see what people are saying, but we do not copy posts, usernames, or accusations onto this page, and we do not treat anything posted online as a source for a claim. If you find something that looks like a genuine lead, send it through the clue form near the top of this page, with a source.
PlatformLive searchWhat you tend to find
Google: Redditsite:reddit.com searchPublic Reddit threads that Google has indexed, including old discussions.
Google: X and TwitterX and Twitter postsPublic posts and profiles that appear in search results.
Google: FacebookPublic Facebook pages and postsOnly public pages and groups that Google can see. Private groups never appear.
Google: Instagram and TikTokInstagram and TikTokPublic posts, memorials, and videos.
Google: forumsForums and message boardsLong-running true-crime forums.
Google NewsLatest newsNewest reporting, which is usually more reliable than posts.
RedditSearch RedditLong discussion threads and theories, often by amateur researchers. No sign-in needed to read.
X (Twitter)Search XShort posts, news links, and anniversary notes. May require sign-in.
FacebookSearch FacebookPublic groups and family or community pages. Requires sign-in.
InstagramSearch #amydiesmanMemorial and true-crime posts. Requires sign-in.
YouTubeSearch YouTubeDocumentaries, news clips, and interviews. Quality varies widely.

Be careful with online theories. Naming a private person as a suspect can harm an innocent family, and many "identifications" on forums have been wrong. Our own tools could not read these platforms: Reddit blocks automated access, and the others require an account. The Google searches above work from your browser. To get new public mentions by email, make a free Google Alert for the case name in quotation marks.

Coverage timeline and verification

What local and national reports say, and when we last checked for a solution.

Last verified Oct 8, 2026. No conviction found. The newest coverage we found is May 2023. We search for arrest, charge, conviction, identification, and genealogy language. This page lists the reports we found and read, oldest first. It is not complete. Print newspaper archives from the years of the crime (for example the Cincinnati Enquirer and Kentucky Post) are not searchable by our tools, so early coverage is mostly missing. A person should check those archives before a case is treated as final.
DateOutletWhat it reportedLink
May 23, 2023
FOX19 / WXIX
Police share evidence; a primary suspect was indicted twice and both cases were dismissed.
Read
Current
Ohio Attorney General
Case listing (seen in search results; not opened).
Read

Status is re-checked on a regular schedule. If you know of a development we missed, use the clue form near the top of this page or the contact form, and include a link.

Suspects

Police have a primary suspect and have not named anyone.

No one has been convicted. A primary suspect was indicted twice and both cases were dismissed. The person has not been named publicly, and we do not name them. We list claims from the record, not guilt.
Unnamed · charges dismissed

The primary suspect

Why named: Police describe the suspect as very close to Diesman. A grand jury indicted the person twice.

Against: Both sets of charges were dismissed, for reasons the FOX19 report calls unclear. No conviction.

Unidentified

The male customer

Why named: He was the last person in the store with Diesman, per police. Police say they do not know who he is.

Against: Police say he may not be the killer.

Unidentified

The female customer

Why named: She left the store before the shooting, per police.

Against: No allegation against her; she is a possible witness.

Some deceased

Other possible suspects

Why named: Police examined other people. Some are now dead.

Against: No names released.

Where a card shows a silhouette, we found no photo. Anyone who wants a photo added, changed, or removed can use the contact form at the bottom of this page.

Latest lead: why the indictments were dismissed

The most important open question is not who, but why a twice-indicted primary suspect was never tried.

Not an accusation. The primary suspect is not named here and has not been convicted. Charges were dismissed twice.

What is known

What would settle it

  1. Review the dismissed cases. Court records in Clermont County should show why each was dismissed.
  2. Identify the male customer and the female customer through records and memories.
  3. Test the bullet and any retained items with current ballistic and DNA methods.
Cold Case Checker's assessment

A killing by someone she knew, with the evidence problem unsolved

We put the chance that the killer knew Diesman at roughly 70%, in line with police and the company's own review. We put the chance that the unnamed primary suspect committed the crime at roughly 35%, because two grand juries indicted, but charges were dismissed and no trial tested the evidence.

Editorial judgment, not statistics.

Elimination matrix

"—" means no public information, not a clean result.

Person or ideaKnew herPhysical linkLegal outcome
Primary suspect (unnamed)✓ per police: very close to her— none published? indicted twice; dismissed
Male customer? unknown— none published— unidentified
Female customer——— unidentified; possible witness

✗ excluded or contradicted · ✓ supports · ? disputed · — nothing public. No cell is an official finding.

Our hypothesis

Editorial reading of public records. A working theory, not a finding, and it names no individual.

Working theory · confidence stated per point

A personal killing at work, done quickly, by someone she knew

  1. It was fast. The window between the last customers and her death was minutes.
  2. Robbery was not the point. Police saw no indication of robbery.
  3. The killer knew her schedule. She had worked there only a week, which suggests someone who knew she was on that shift.
  4. The legal record is the key. Why two indictments failed matters more than any new theory.
Killer knew her Planned or opportunistic after an argument Primary suspect guilty Solved within five years

Judgment, not statistics.

Missing links

Questions raised by gaps in the public record.

1. The dismissals

The court records explaining why both indictments were dismissed.

2. The customers

Who the female and male customers were, and whether either has been interviewed.

3. The weapon

Ballistic results on the .25 bullet and any link to other crimes.

4. The sweatshirt

Whether the WEBN sweatshirt belonged to anyone connected, and whether modern DNA testing was tried.

5. The store's records

Registers, schedules, and the company's internal review.

6. Her schedule

Who knew she had just started third shift.

7. The sketch

Who the sketch was based on, and whether it was ever shown to witnesses.

8. A refreshed interview round

Re-interviews of people from 1987, including relatives of those now deceased.

Evidence gaps

"Not public" means we could not find a report.

ItemTestedGap
.25 bulletSent to a ballistics lab.Results: not public.
WEBN sweatshirtNo DNA found.Other tests: not public.
Grand jury recordsIndictments dismissed.Reasons: not public.
Police fileHeld by Pierce Township Police.Public index: not available.

Forensic tech

ToolWhat it could doStatus here
Ballistics database (NIBIN)Link the bullet to other crimes.Results not reported
DNA from the sweatshirtIdentify a donor.Tested; no DNA found
Genetic genealogyIdentify an unknown donor.Needs DNA; none reported
Cold-case grant supportBCI assistance.Used

Solved cases

Local cases that moved after decades.

Carol Sue Klaber (Boone County, KY, 1976)

Investigators say a private genealogy investigation helped them identify Thomas Dunaway, who died in 1990, as the man who killed the 16-year-old. He cannot be indicted, so prosecutors sent a letter saying he would have been charged. The lesson: genealogy can name a killer after decades, even when no trial is possible.

Forensic genetic genealogy training

In 2024, local investigators were being trained in the technique, which has already helped solve Cincinnati-area cases, according to FOX19. The lesson: the tool is now local, so cases with usable DNA have a real path forward.

Golden State Killer

Old crime-scene DNA matched relatives in a public database and led to a 2018 arrest. The lesson: a usable sample can still work after decades.

Case details come from public news coverage and the Boone County Sheriff's cold-case list. Confirm in court records.

False leads

ClaimSource and dateWhere it stands
Someone close to her got away with itA Medium essayPolice say they have a primary suspect, but charges were dismissed; no conviction.
The male customer is the killerPolice interestPolice say he may not be the killer.
The sweatshirt belonged to the killerPolice thought it "possibly" was connectedNo DNA found; relevance unknown.
The store address differs by sourceVariousSources describe a Stop N Go or Merwin Stop-N-Go on Ohio 125.

Where

The shooting happened at a convenience store on Ohio 125 in Pierce Township, Clermont County, east of Cincinnati.

Open in maps: Ohio 125, Pierce Township. We show no photograph of the scene.

Source ratings

SourceTypeRatingUse with care because
Ohio Attorney General cold-case listingAgencyABrief.
FOX19 / WXIX, May 2023Local newsB+Quotes the lead investigator; some points are his interpretation.
Medium essays and podcastsAdvocacyDOne claims police have long had a suspect.

Records

Pierce Township Police Department

Lead agency. Lt. Bryan Burke has led the case since 2007. FOX19 listed 513-752-4100 in 2023; please confirm before calling.

Clermont County Prosecutor and Common Pleas Court

The two dismissed indictments.

Ohio Attorney General (BCI)

Cold-case grant and the unsolved-homicide listing.

Sample public-records request

Under the Ohio Public Records Act, I request copies of non-exempt records relating to the September 12, 1987 homicide of Amy Diesman in Pierce Township, Clermont County, including incident reports, laboratory reports, and any evidence inventory. Please send electronic copies. If any part is withheld, please identify the exemption relied on and release all reasonably segregable material.

Agencies often withhold records of open investigations, so expect partial answers.

Remembering the victims

Amy was 19, a new mother with plans to study nursing. Her parents died before the case was solved.

If you know something, even something that seems small, contact the investigating agency named above or tips.fbi.gov. We do not list memorial pages until we can confirm families support them.

News & databases

In the news

Loading headlines…

Sources

Every fact on this page comes from one of these. Where they disagree, we say so above.

Almost everything comes from one May 2023 FOX19 report. The primary suspect and the reasons for dismissal are not named in public sources we found. The Medium essay's claim is unverified. Tip-line number is as published in 2023. We found no coverage newer than 2023.

Change log